The Challenge: Meeting Legal Demands at Speed and Scale As a global leader in climate and energy, we routinely manage high-stakes litigation and regulatory matters that involve massive volumes of documents and tight timelines. Traditional review methods were proving unsustainable. We needed a more agile, intelligent solution to keep pace with growing demands. That’s whenContinue reading “Accelerating AI Adoption with Confidence: Our Journey with aiR for Review”
Author Archives: Page One Legal
Page One Earns aiR for Review Solution Competency from Relativity
NASHVILLE, Tenn. – Sept. 17, 2025 – Page One, a renowned eDiscovery services provider, today announced it has earned the Relativity aiR for Review Solution Competency. With this achievement, global legal technology company Relativity recognizes that Page One has demonstrated proficiency and proven customer success in leveraging aiR for Review to make document review faster,Continue reading “Page One Earns aiR for Review Solution Competency from Relativity”
Privilege at Speed: How Generative AI and the Client Brain Save Time and Money
Every second counts and you’re already behind about a million of them. The volume of data involved in discovery projects is enormous (and climbing), and review teams can easily lose hours repeating work that’s already been done. That’s where the Client Brain in Relativity’s aiR for Privilege makes a real difference, by carrying knowledge forward,Continue reading “Privilege at Speed: How Generative AI and the Client Brain Save Time and Money”
The Hidden Cost of Inconsistent Privilege Logs
Privilege logs are often considered one of the most tedious parts of discovery. They’re repetitive, time-consuming, costly and seemingly straightforward. A list of documents withheld on the basis of attorney-client privilege or work product protection. But beneath their mundane appearance, privilege logs can be a minefield. Inconsistent or vague descriptions don’t just waste reviewer time;Continue reading “The Hidden Cost of Inconsistent Privilege Logs”
Case Study: 24-Hour Mobile Data Collection from Request to Production
The Challenge: Fast, Targeted Mobile Collections Early one morning, a top Am Law 200 firm faced a high-pressure deadline. They needed to collect, process, review, and produce mobile data from four custodians within 24-hours. The scope was narrow: a specific date range, text messages ensuring the speed of collection and privacy of custodians data. TheContinue reading “Case Study: 24-Hour Mobile Data Collection from Request to Production”
Don’t Chase Words, Find Meaning
Traditional keyword searching is inherently limited. Attorneys have to guess at the right terms, anticipate nicknames, acronyms, and code words, and then spend hours sorting through irrelevant material that simply happens to contain those terms. This approach increases the risk of missing critical documents while also driving up review costs. In high-stakes litigation, neither overproductionContinue reading “Don’t Chase Words, Find Meaning”
Smarter, Faster, More Targeted Review
Keyword searches force reviewers to work with guesswork. You start with a long list of words and variations, only to discover that many documents are irrelevant false positives, while others slip through because the right terms weren’t anticipated. This slows review down and makes it harder to focus on the material that actually matters. Relativity’sContinue reading “Smarter, Faster, More Targeted Review”
From Keywords to Context: Enhancing Review with Fresh aiR
Opposing parties will often agree to search terms and a date range to define the initial review population. This step remains important for setting common ground, ensuring transparency, and creating a defensible baseline for what will be collected and reviewed. However, search terms alone often cast a wide net, pulling in many irrelevant documents whileContinue reading “From Keywords to Context: Enhancing Review with Fresh aiR”
Decoding Relationships: When “James” Isn’t Just James
Picture this: You’re deep in a document set and come across an email that says, “I talked to James, and he said we should move forward.” On its face, this looks harmless. But who is James? If James is general counsel, the statement could reflect privileged legal advice. If James is a business manager, itContinue reading “Decoding Relationships: When “James” Isn’t Just James”
Why Privilege Review Is So Hard and How AI Can Help
Privilege review has long been one of the most time-consuming and stressful parts of discovery. Attorneys know that a single misstep, producing a privileged document or over-redacting, can change the course of a case. Despite years of refinement, the traditional approach to privilege review remains cumbersome, expensive, and risky. Why It’s So Difficult Privilege reviewContinue reading “Why Privilege Review Is So Hard and How AI Can Help”